A rebuttal to Steven Sherwood and the solar forcing pundits of the IPCC AR5 draft leak
Teaming up with Jo Nova to answer The Team down under: "Professor Sherwood is inverting the scientific method"
Guest post by Alec Rawls
My leak of the draft IPCC report emphasized the chapter 7 admission of strong evidence for solar forcing beyond the very slight variance in solar irradiance, even if we don't know the mechanism:
The forcing from changes in total solar irradiance alone does not seem to account for these observations, implying the existence of an amplifying mechanism such as the hypothesized GCR-cloud link.
IPCC AR5
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply
-
Archives
- May 2013 (7)
- April 2013 (8)
- March 2013 (22)
- February 2013 (20)
- January 2013 (29)
- December 2012 (26)
- November 2012 (15)
- October 2012 (26)
- September 2012 (23)
- August 2012 (40)
- July 2012 (16)
- June 2012 (12)
-
Categories
- ANFIS
- Artificial Intelligence
- artifisial inteligen
- astronomy
- automata
- banjir
- chaos
- Climate
- communication
- Complex System
- Cosmic Rays
- Dasar Rekayasa
- dinamika sistem
- drought
- earthquake
- Ecology
- Economy
- energy
- entropy
- Expert System
- filsafat
- flow
- fluids
- fractal
- fuel cell
- fuzzy control
- fuzzy logic
- geothermal
- global cooling
- global warming
- Greetings
- Indonesia
- Intelligence
- ionosphere
- komputasi
- krisis
- lattice gas
- Machine Learning
- magnetic properties
- Mathematics
- music
- Neural networks
- neuro-fuzzy
- nuclear energy
- pengembangan berkelanjutan
- philosophy
- Physics
- PLTN
- population
- rock magnetism
- sains
- Science
- simulasi
- sistem pakar
- soft computing
- Solar Activity
- solar flare
- solar radiation
- Songs
- sumber daya alam
- sun
- System Dynamics
- TEC
- teknologi
- telematika
- tools
- universe
- Web and Text Mining
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
